Pay for the manufacturer’s best processors or bet on a midrange?
If we recall, not too long ago the difference between a mid-range SoC and a high-end SoC was substantial. Especially in performance, since efficiency as such was not a matter that should be taken into account as much as in recent months.
But that has changed, and today Qualcomm’s mid-range processors, for example, outperformed the benchmarks of a year ago, as you can see from how the Snapdragon 660 outperforms the 820 – which I use today, and I can tell you it still runs smoothly over time.
However, there are some differences such as image processing or the amount of RAM it supports, among other topics. But to tell you the truth, the current mid-range is slowly catching up to the top range. They are becoming less and less differentiated in terms of performance and although the distance is longer, as in the case of the Snapdragon 625 and its older siblings, as a rule these processors are able to easily move all the applications and daily tasks without disheveling.
It’s not worth spending that much money on the latter.
From our point of view, it is not worth paying for the latest model with options such as Qualcomm’s 660. Although, to tell you the truth, if we want to have access to a better camera with more options, more RAM or a better terminal, we’ll have to opt for a more expensive processor. In any case, the ideal thing is to find the right combination for you.
If we talk about Mediatek or other manufacturers, such as Huawei Kirin or Samsung Exynos, things change somewhat. Within these options, the differences are somewhat greater, and until a few years pass it may not be worthwhile. At least not as much as Qualcomm’s catalogue.